503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.75%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
5.34%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.02%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
3.28%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.45%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
3.06%
R&D change of 3.06% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-1.22%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
10.75%
Marketing expense change of 10.75% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
935.00%
Other expenses change of 935.00% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
6.07%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.62%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
5.81%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.81%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
4.05%
D&A change of 4.05% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-74.07%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.80%
Margin change of 1.80% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-96.99%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-97.10%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1618.18%
Other expenses change of 1618.18% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-94.36%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-94.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-32.19%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-109.63%
Net income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-109.28%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-109.62%
EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-109.78%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.15%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-1.29%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.