PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.36%
Revenue decline while Technology median is -3.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
0.12%
Cost increase while Technology shows cost reduction. Peter Lynch would examine competitive disadvantages.
-14.80%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is -2.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-3.88%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-5.17%
R&D reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-0.79%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-22.11%
Marketing expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
20.96%
Other expenses change of 20.96% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-13.03%
Operating expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.34%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is -1.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.92%
D&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
238.44%
EBITDA growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-6.69%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is -5.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
2664.58%
Operating income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
3018.79%
Operating margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
35.33%
Other expenses change of 35.33% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
1441.50%
Pre-tax income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1639.01%
Pre-tax margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
25.50%
Tax expense growth while Technology reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
1007.72%
Net income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1124.02%
Net margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1002.90%
EPS growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1002.90%
Diluted EPS growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
0.10%
Share count change of 0.10% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.26%
Diluted share change of 1.26% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.