503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while Technology median is 4.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
17.03%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.59%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.97%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is 4.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-6.25%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
5.42%
R&D change of 5.42% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-26.93%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
11.44%
Marketing expense change of 11.44% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
231.25%
Other expenses change of 231.25% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
1.62%
Operating expenses growth 50-90% of Technology median of 2.81%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
7.35%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.21%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
10.09%
Interest expense change of 10.09% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-6.65%
D&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-17.31%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.10%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-20.22%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.84%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
900.00%
Other expenses change of 900.00% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-19.18%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-16.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-23.77%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-18.00%
Net income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-15.56%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.06%
EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.06%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.15%
Diluted share change of 0.15% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.