503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
27.05%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.98%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.44%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.77%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.50%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
13.85%
R&D change of 13.85% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
17.75%
G&A change of 17.75% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
32.19%
Marketing expense change of 32.19% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
8.33%
Other expenses change of 8.33% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
23.18%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.15%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
24.90%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.57%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-3.43%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
38.80%
D&A change of 38.80% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
21.71%
EBITDA change of 21.71% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.05%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.90%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
658.82%
Other expenses change of 658.82% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-5.46%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
51.50%
Tax expense change of 51.50% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-18.52%
Net income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-28.90%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.65%
EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-19.12%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.