PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.08%
Revenue growth 75-90% of Technology median of 2.55%. John Neff would investigate if lower growth reflects opportunity.
4.29%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.03%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.99%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Technology median of 1.73%. Guy Spier would scrutinize competitive position.
-1.06%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
3.69%
R&D change of 3.69% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
16.59%
G&A change of 16.59% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
6.79%
Marketing expense change of 6.79% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
114.81%
Other expenses change of 114.81% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
6.98%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.78%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
5.69%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.97%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
17.06%
Interest expense change of 17.06% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-1.45%
D&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-100.19%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.65%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-131.13%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-130.50%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
485.71%
Other expenses change of 485.71% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-126.94%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-126.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.07%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-164.09%
Net income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-162.79%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-165.57%
EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-165.57%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1.30%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-2.14%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.