PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.29%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
2.38%
Cost growth near Technology median of 2.58%. Charlie Munger would verify if industry cost structure is attractive.
14.23%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.97%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
3.58%
Margin change of 3.58% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
4.56%
R&D change of 4.56% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
20.87%
G&A change of 20.87% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
8.70%
Marketing expense change of 8.70% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-856.25%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
8.35%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.55%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
5.35%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 3.96%. Guy Spier would scrutinize spending.
-0.30%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.07%
D&A reduction while Technology median is 1.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
22.02%
EBITDA change of 22.02% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.45%
Margin change of 3.45% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
19.96%
Income change of 19.96% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
8.77%
Margin change of 8.77% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
31.72%
Other expenses change of 31.72% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
20.12%
Income change of 20.12% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
8.91%
Margin change of 8.91% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-135.24%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
49.70%
Income change of 49.70% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
35.73%
Margin change of 35.73% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
49.57%
EPS change of 49.57% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.00%
Diluted EPS change of 50.00% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.