503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.96%
Revenue decline while Technology median is -3.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-0.06%
Cost reduction while Technology median is -4.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-2.81%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is -2.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-0.87%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
1.15%
R&D change of 1.15% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-25.54%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-12.60%
Marketing expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
85.12%
Other expenses change of 85.12% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-8.60%
Operating expenses reduction while Technology median is -1.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.42%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is -4.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.78%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.61%
D&A change of 1.61% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-3.29%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is -2.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
4.86%
Margin change of 4.86% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2.27%
Operating income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
4.31%
Operating margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
0.71%
Pre-tax income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2.73%
Margin change of 2.73% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
439.76%
Tax expense change of 439.76% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-19.03%
Net income decline while Technology median is -1.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.40%
Net margin decline while Technology median is -0.86%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.60%
EPS decline while Technology median is -0.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-19.30%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.27%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.