503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.11%
Revenue decline while Technology median is 4.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-11.19%
Cost reduction while Technology median is 3.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-2.04%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is 6.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
3.23%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
6.17%
R&D change of 6.17% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
13.56%
G&A change of 13.56% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-0.45%
Marketing expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
84.21%
Other expenses change of 84.21% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
3.88%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.74%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-4.21%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is 2.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-6.12%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-2.65%
D&A reduction while Technology median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-5.86%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 8.71%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.55%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 6.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.59%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 10.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1.57%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 9.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-168.04%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is -2.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.82%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 9.95%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 8.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.16%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 4.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-7.70%
Net income decline while Technology median is 11.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.73%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 8.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.84%
EPS decline while Technology median is 12.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.28%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 12.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.