PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.30%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.35%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
4.14%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 3.13%. Guy Spier would scrutinize cost control weaknesses.
7.26%
Growth of 7.26% versus flat Technology gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.90%
Margin change of 0.90% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-3.51%
R&D reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
33.72%
G&A change of 33.72% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
7.90%
Marketing expense change of 7.90% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
34.41%
Other expenses change of 34.41% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
5.31%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.53%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
4.69%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.67%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-2.82%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
9.16%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.39%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
12.29%
EBITDA change of 12.29% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2.63%
Margin change of 2.63% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
8.51%
Income change of 8.51% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2.07%
Margin change of 2.07% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
47.35%
Other expenses change of 47.35% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
9.06%
Income change of 9.06% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2.59%
Margin change of 2.59% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
6.22%
Tax expense change of 6.22% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
9.74%
Income change of 9.74% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.23%
Margin change of 3.23% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.76%
EPS change of 9.76% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.80%
Diluted EPS change of 9.80% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.09%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.