503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.74%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
20.37%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.50%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.43%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.28%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.93%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
7.25%
R&D change of 7.25% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
34.12%
G&A change of 34.12% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
20.42%
Marketing expense change of 20.42% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-23.36%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
15.35%
Operating expenses change of 15.35% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
18.11%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.27%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
73.14%
Interest expense change of 73.14% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
51.98%
D&A change of 51.98% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
7.06%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.94%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-3.98%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of Technology median of 2.95%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
-8.41%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-230.08%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-2.78%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.75%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.89%
Net income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.59%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.00%
EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.01%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.04%
Share count reduction below 50% of Technology median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.