PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.26%
Revenue decline while Technology median is 1.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-5.70%
Cost reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
2.25%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Technology median of 3.69%. Guy Spier would scrutinize competitive position.
2.52%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.88%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
7.15%
R&D change of 7.15% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-3.29%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-0.62%
Marketing expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-187.57%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.65%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.14%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-2.03%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is 0.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-11.99%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.14%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.10%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
1.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of Technology median of 6.94%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
0.42%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of Technology median of 4.14%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
2.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of Technology median of 5.36%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
2.30%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of Technology median of 3.66%. Guy Spier would scrutinize operations.
-68.77%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 3.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
0.76%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of Technology median of 9.75%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of Technology median of 6.41%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
2.84%
Tax expense change of 2.84% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
0.32%
Net income growth below 50% of Technology median of 9.29%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
0.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of Technology median of 5.74%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
0.34%
EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 9.30%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
0.34%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 9.45%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Technology median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.