503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.64%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 3.99%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine if this outperformance is sustainable.
6.37%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.19%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
3.90%
Gross profit growth near Technology median of 3.90%. Charlie Munger would verify if industry economics are attractive.
-0.71%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
5.27%
R&D change of 5.27% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
17.47%
G&A change of 17.47% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
9.81%
Marketing expense change of 9.81% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-8.44%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
8.53%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.27%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
7.37%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.73%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-12.38%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
5.86%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.64%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
2.07%
EBITDA change of 2.07% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-2.45%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.25%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-3.24%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
20.96%
Other expenses change of 20.96% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
1.96%
Income change of 1.96% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-2.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
8.90%
Tax expense change of 8.90% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
0.44%
Income change of 0.44% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-4.01%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.34%
EPS change of 0.34% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.34%
Diluted EPS change of 0.34% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.03%
Share count change of 0.03% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.