503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.96%
Revenue growth 0-5% indicates modest expansion. Howard Marks would investigate if this reflects market maturity.
612.12%
Cost of revenue up >15% signals severe cost pressure. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of corresponding revenue growth.
-5.24%
Negative gross profit growth is a serious warning sign. Benjamin Graham would demand thorough analysis of pricing power and cost structure.
-9.72%
Negative gross margin growth suggests serious pricing or cost issues. Benjamin Graham would demand thorough analysis.
-14.06%
Negative R&D growth (spending reduction) needs careful analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.20%
Negative operating expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
1.88%
Total costs growth 0-3% reflects moderate increase. Benjamin Graham would check revenue alignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.82%
Negative D&A growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine asset reduction strategy.
4.15%
EBITDA growth 4-8% suggests moderate improvement. Benjamin Graham would check quality of earnings.
-12.61%
Negative EBITDA margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
8.27%
Operating income growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
3.16%
Operating margin growth 3-5% shows strong cost control. Peter Lynch would examine pricing power.
155.15%
Other expenses growth above 30% signals concerning expansion. Seth Klarman would scrutinize unusual items.
19.88%
Pre-tax income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
14.21%
Pre-tax margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional cost management. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
12.18%
Tax expense growth 10-20% suggests significant increase. Howard Marks would demand explanation.
24.02%
Net income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional bottom-line expansion. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
18.17%
Net margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
21.43%
EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional shareholder value creation. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional value creation despite potential dilution. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-0.01%
Share count reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.