PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.33%
Revenue growth above 20% indicates exceptional top-line expansion. Peter Lynch would verify if this growth is sustainable and profitable. Cross-check Operating Margins.
61.75%
Cost of revenue up >15% signals severe cost pressure. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of corresponding revenue growth.
21.02%
Gross profit growth 20-25% shows strong business economics. Peter Lynch would examine if growth can compound.
-8.55%
Negative gross margin growth suggests serious pricing or cost issues. Benjamin Graham would demand thorough analysis.
-0.69%
Negative R&D growth (spending reduction) needs careful analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on competitive position.
22.27%
G&A growth above 5% signals concerning overhead expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification for increased costs.
29.63%
Marketing expense growth above 10% signals aggressive spending. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of revenue impact.
-238.75%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
16.71%
Operating expenses growth above 10% signals concerning cost expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification.
35.71%
Total costs growth above 5% signals concerning expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification.
14.41%
Interest expense growth above 10% signals concerning debt expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification.
32.18%
D&A growth above 10% signals heavy asset expansion. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of future payoff.
10.04%
EBITDA growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
-6.47%
Negative EBITDA margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
25.81%
Operating income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional core profitability. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-4.92%
Negative operating margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-222.97%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
22.94%
Pre-tax income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-7.09%
Negative pre-tax margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
13.40%
Tax expense growth 10-20% suggests significant increase. Howard Marks would demand explanation.
25.06%
Net income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional bottom-line expansion. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-5.49%
Negative net margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
25.40%
EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional shareholder value creation. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
25.81%
Diluted EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional value creation despite potential dilution. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-0.16%
Share count reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.