PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
3.22
Current Ratio > 1.5x PANW's 1.21. David Dodd would confirm if this surplus liquidity is put to good use.
3.16
Quick Ratio > 1.5x PANW's 1.21. David Dodd would verify if the company can handle unexpected shortfalls much better.
0.34
0.5–0.75x PANW's 0.55. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are too high relative to cash.
39.85
Positive interest coverage while PANW shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our debt service advantages in a challenging market.
3.61
Short-term coverage of 3.61 while PANW has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.