PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.50
Similar to PANW's ratio of 2.75. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
2.45
0.75–0.9x PANW's 2.75. Bill Ackman would recommend finding ways to boost near-cash assets or reduce short-term liabilities.
0.19
Below 0.5x PANW's 1.88. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
38.36
Interest coverage of 38.36 while PANW has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our debt management provides advantages.
3.72
Short-term coverage of 3.72 while PANW has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.