PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.51
Current Ratio > 1.5x PANW's 1.04. David Dodd would confirm if this surplus liquidity is put to good use.
2.45
Quick Ratio > 1.5x PANW's 1.04. David Dodd would verify if the company can handle unexpected shortfalls much better.
0.11
Below 0.5x PANW's 0.36. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
-8.31
Both companies show negative interest coverage. Martin Whitman would investigate if industry distress creates special situation opportunities.
0.90
Short-term coverage of 0.90 while PANW has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.