PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.82
0.5–0.75x ZETA's 3.25. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are sufficiently covered.
1.78
0.5–0.75x ZETA's 3.25. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
0.31
Below 0.5x ZETA's 1.88. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
117.95
Positive interest coverage while ZETA shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our debt service advantages in a challenging market.
2.71
Short-term coverage of 2.71 while ZETA has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.