PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
3.00
Similar to ZETA's ratio of 3.25. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
2.93
Similar ratio to ZETA's 3.25. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.17
Below 0.5x ZETA's 1.88. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
19.50
Positive interest coverage while ZETA shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our debt service advantages in a challenging market.
1.34
Short-term coverage of 1.34 while ZETA has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.