PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
8.40%
Positive ROE while ZETA is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
6.26%
Positive ROA while ZETA shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
10.69%
Positive ROCE while ZETA is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
89.47%
Gross margin above 1.5x ZETA's 56.43%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
35.09%
Positive operating margin while ZETA is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
25.17%
Positive net margin while ZETA is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.