PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
10.58%
ROE of 10.58% while ZETA has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
4.12%
ROA of 4.12% while ZETA has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
6.22%
ROCE of 6.22% while ZETA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
66.51%
Similar gross margin to ZETA's 62.02%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
37.64%
Positive operating margin while ZETA is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
31.56%
Positive net margin while ZETA is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.