PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
9.39%
ROE of 9.39% while ZETA has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
3.77%
ROA of 3.77% while ZETA has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
5.72%
ROCE of 5.72% while ZETA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
68.66%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 57.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
37.05%
Operating margin above 1.5x ZETA's 0.66%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s operations are uniquely productive.
30.70%
Positive net margin while ZETA is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.