PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.80%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 1.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.74%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 3.82%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
99.93%
Well above AMD's 150.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-99.93%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-75.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -233.99%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
65.49%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 137.10%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-203.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -228.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
177.25%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 933.33%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-66.26%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -1648.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
2.69%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AMD's 29.35%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. AMD's 1200.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
27.78%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -383.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
218.65%
1.25-1.5x AMD's 194.92%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
100.00%
Growth well above AMD's 125.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
90.46%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 11.15%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -46.67%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-149.96%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.