PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.11%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 79.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-8.63%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-331.25%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-59.60%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -72.73%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
336.79%
Well above AMD's 197.22% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
143.06%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. AMD's 289.09%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
8.02%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 33.33%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
188.76%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -109.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
59.50%
Growth well above AMD's 98.69%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-19.83%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -99.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
33.03%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -73.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.29%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -21.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above AMD's 101.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-542.02%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 31.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
167.39%
At 50-75% of AMD's 253.85%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -100.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.51%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 39.26%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-25.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.