PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.60%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -232.12%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.78%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -3.05%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
100.00%
Well above AMD's 60.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-45.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -183.81%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
143.65%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -163.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
107.43%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -1200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
84.10%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 30933.33%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
8.03%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -1612.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
20.07%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AMD's 67.18%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.02%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 68.42%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-25.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -42.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.43%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 184.34%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.13%
Issuance growth of 97.13% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
0.49%
Buyback growth of 0.49% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.