PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.20%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 70.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.97%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -7.59%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
40.24%
Well above AMD's 27.47% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -294.62%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.96%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -40.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.12%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -105.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
83.40%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -124.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -56.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-187.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 25.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.45%
Purchases growth of 43.45% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
135.13%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -91.89%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
98.01%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -51.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
105.76%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -450.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.14%
Issuance growth of 41.14% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
30.43%
Buyback growth of 30.43% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.