PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
202.16%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -174.42%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.12%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -5.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
117.85%
Well above AMD's 181.82% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-9.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -4.35%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-124.83%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -24.10%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
4.04%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -12.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-97.43%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -925.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-18.55%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 109.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-130.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -283.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-74.93%
Negative yoy while AMD is 91.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
4.59%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -26.53%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
6.02%
CapEx growth of 6.02% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.86%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -292.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-2.06%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -47.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-227.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -85.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
27.19%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -162.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while AMD is negative at -280.47%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
506.84%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.