PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.97%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 36.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -1.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
211.24%
Well above AMD's 400.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.26%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 22.73%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-70.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 49.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-773.73%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 58.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-7.05%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -60.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-26.15%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -936.36%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
71.54%
Growth well above AMD's 99.39%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
170.05%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -912.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-107.79%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 21.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.34%
CapEx growth of 24.34% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.71%
Purchases well above AMD's 18.97%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
45.70%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 2.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.79%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 86.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-173.79%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 93.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
37.58%
Stock issuance far above AMD's 50.00%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.