176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
102.27%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -278.35%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.03%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -11.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-116.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 95.88%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.76%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -4.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
423.03%
Well above AMD's 822.22% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1608.83%
AR growth well above AMD's 93.33%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-41.79%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -36.27%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-205.04%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -23.53%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
407.85%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -420.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-3664.96%
Negative yoy while AMD is 114.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
104.86%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -1.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.20%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.26%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 75.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-19.17%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -46.84%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-287.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -112.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-88.59%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 185.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-190.70%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
178.34%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.