PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
96.98%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 49.32%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.13%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -10.61%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
179.92%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-9.32%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -16.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
78.55%
Well above AMD's 69.28% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
55.09%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -78.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-1937.56%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -86.54%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-4.14%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 1058.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
110.36%
Growth well above AMD's 46.67%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
644.85%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -84.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
2281.65%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AMD's 77.42%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-114.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -40.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.77%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -8.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-19.08%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 37.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-237.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -98.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
74.72%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -257.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
3.69%
Debt repayment growth of 3.69% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.