PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.63%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 164.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.70%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -3.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
184.35%
Deferred tax of 184.35% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.52%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 15.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-327.22%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -102.13%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.62%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -712.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
6.94%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -117.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-151.50%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 115.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-838.58%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 277.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-100.06%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -237.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.66%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 160.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.86%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 46.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 40.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-16.47%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 9.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
172.82%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AMD's 1800.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-115.81%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 351.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.