PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.82%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -80.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.51%
D&A growth of 3.51% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
180.05%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -93.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-3.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -8.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-828.21%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 57.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-165.64%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -300.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-116.35%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -742.86%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
131.35%
AP growth well above AMD's 98.39%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
61.98%
Growth well above AMD's 104.40%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
34.51%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 2400.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-45.08%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 86.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -9.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.25%
Purchases well above AMD's 0.65%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
214.86%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 44.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
55052.00%
Growth well above AMD's 81.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
408.43%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 67.18%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-2.95%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 16.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-650.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.