PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.11%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 147.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.43%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -7.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
247.68%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.88%
SBC growth of 5.88% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
37.81%
Well above AMD's 44.44% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
58.62%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -225.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
62.52%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 168.89%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-111.56%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 1400.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
24.60%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -800.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-17.20%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -108.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
68.26%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 164.29%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
55.10%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -26.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.83%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 90.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-70.35%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -38.89%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 840.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-126.32%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 376.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.04%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 99.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.