PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.74%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -2241.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-12.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -2.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-11.84%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.55%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -23.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
359.79%
Well above AMD's 361.54% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
171.43%
AR growth well above AMD's 245.19%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-195.87%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 243.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1035.24%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -576.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
594.86%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -42.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
213.68%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 6275.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
146.87%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 544.44%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-73.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 24.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
244.54%
Acquisition growth of 244.54% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-239.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -414.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
66.89%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 18.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-150.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -56.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-486.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -63.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.99%
We repay more while AMD is negative at -7100.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.