PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.08%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 50.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.45%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -4.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
185.58%
Well above AMD's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.89%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 6.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-160.15%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -175.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
33.41%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -69.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
24.55%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -102.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-182.69%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-182.35%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 35.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-253.77%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -70.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-62.31%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -249.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
56.21%
CapEx growth of 56.21% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
39.14%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -54.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
15.19%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 10.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
934.48%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -89.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
69.96%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -134.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-222.27%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 98.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1240.34%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.