PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.26%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -0.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.95%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -2.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-21.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.15%
SBC growth of 8.15% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-72.18%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 142.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-362.93%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 80.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
208.95%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -1750.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-227.74%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 130.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
59.55%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 200.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
296.91%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -91.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-36.25%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 66.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.50%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 22.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.89%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 98.21%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-5.50%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-101.20%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 3157.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
80.94%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 1506.67%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-0.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -4200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.