PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.66%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 48.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.75%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -19.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-13.80%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.50%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 23.08%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
253.87%
Well above AMD's 75.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
196.15%
AR growth well above AMD's 231.43%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-268.49%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 241.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-149.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -783.33%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
452.03%
Growth well above AMD's 42.86%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
49.95%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -136.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
105.33%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of AMD's 189.83%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
21.88%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -28.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-4.07%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-114700.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1940.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -88.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2.71%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
Buyback growth of 98.84% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.