PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.62%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -6.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.08%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -2.94%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
36.67%
Deferred tax of 36.67% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
5.96%
SBC growth of 5.96% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-115.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -83.04%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-79.87%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -77.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
159.91%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -96.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-82.45%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 67.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-110.75%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 525.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-19.77%
Negative yoy while AMD is 85.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-44.44%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -179.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
3.37%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AMD's 18.75%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.21%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
136.96%
Liquidation growth of 136.96% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
99.65%
Growth of 99.65% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
26.14%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 18.75%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-32.10%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-1372.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.