176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-80.60%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 163.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.26%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
32.14%
Deferred tax of 32.14% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
6.67%
SBC growth well above AMD's 12.50%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -452.63%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-427.78%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -730.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-106.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -2400.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
180.60%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 1137.04%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -770.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
760.00%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -14800.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-33.74%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -102.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
20.00%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 19.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.12%
Purchases growth of 53.12% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-21.07%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
2500.00%
Growth of 2500.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
205.11%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 1365.38%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-652.83%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.