176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -43.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
22.22%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-10.17%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -20.69%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-111.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -286.96%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-154.84%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -155.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
228.57%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -519.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
277.78%
AP growth well above AMD's 156.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-140.88%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-14.29%
Negative yoy while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-39.53%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -259.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-266.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -9.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.96%
Purchases growth of 41.96% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
14.47%
Liquidation growth of 14.47% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
20.00%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
182.63%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -846.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
66.67%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of AMD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-270.37%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.