176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
43.32%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -12.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.76%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.49%
SBC growth well above AMD's 9.09%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
204.55%
Well above AMD's 58.20% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
118.99%
AR growth well above AMD's 76.58%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-2.94%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 134.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
28.57%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -82.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-83.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -136.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-14.29%
Negative yoy while AMD is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
64.11%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 311.11%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-27.78%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 23.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.09%
Purchases growth of 9.09% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
11.62%
Liquidation growth of 11.62% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
12.34%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AMD's 200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
9.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 89.74%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
54.41%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of AMD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.08%
Buyback growth of 80.08% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.