PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
33.69%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -62.75%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.20%
D&A growth well above AMD's 4.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1302.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
17.76%
SBC growth of 17.76% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
396.52%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -23.53%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-317.78%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 40.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
274.29%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -991.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-30.00%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 616.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
3533.33%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -40.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-16.67%
Negative yoy while AMD is 591.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
17.37%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -26.32%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-502.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -24.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.59%
Liquidation growth of 9.59% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-99.44%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 102.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-108.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -375.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
85.48%
Debt repayment growth of 85.48% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.82%
Buyback growth of 76.82% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.