PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.17%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -57.89%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.56%
D&A growth well above AMD's 6.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
109.86%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AMD's 450.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
2.38%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 13.89%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-104.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -168.25%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
157.14%
AR growth well above AMD's 90.57%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-103.28%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -2.80%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-65.08%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -247.67%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-119.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -84.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-260.00%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -90.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.41%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -404.29%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
71.63%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -51.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-36950.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -196.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-32.00%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 830.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-171750.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -61.97%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-14695.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -355.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
77.78%
We repay more while AMD is negative at -530.77%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -98.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-1771.43%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.