PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.50%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 118.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.51%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 52.17%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
21.57%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -85.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.10%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 9.76%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-1428.57%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 62.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-889.29%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -1760.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-14550.00%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 45.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
581.82%
AP growth well above AMD's 52.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
250.96%
Growth well above AMD's 188.54%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-75.00%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -25.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-36.82%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 114.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.32%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 6.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
915.44%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -45.16%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
80.31%
Growth well above AMD's 88.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
77.33%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 95.95%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AMD's 57.32%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.92%
Buyback growth of 89.92% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.