PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.72%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 242.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.25%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -1.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-233.87%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 3200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.76%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 20.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-99.30%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 42.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-26.02%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 35.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-10.92%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 58.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-65.33%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 113.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-114.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -95.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
7.14%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -133.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-46.66%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 680.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 5.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.38%
Purchases growth of 13.38% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
21.18%
Below 50% of AMD's 223.53%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
154.59%
Growth well above AMD's 119.61%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
127.20%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 914.29%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-203.03%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.