PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.39%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -4.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
16.67%
D&A growth well above AMD's 6.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
87.83%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AMD's 550.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
13.38%
SBC growth well above AMD's 3.51%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-77.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -12866.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-77.08%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 136.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
198.08%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -227.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
65.74%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -177.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-164.16%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 63.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
80.00%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -95.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -114.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
36.95%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -30.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.96%
Purchases growth of 39.96% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
75.53%
At 50-75% of AMD's 131.25%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
567.90%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -212.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
3637.50%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -180.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to AMD's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.86%
Buyback growth of 70.86% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.