PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.79%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 356.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.22%
D&A growth well above AMD's 8.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
4.55%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -3157.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-1.35%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-58.60%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-292.38%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 119.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-56.86%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -434.38%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-23.53%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -324.82%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2728.57%
Growth well above AMD's 304.33%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
3050.00%
Well above AMD's 112.50%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-10.67%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 63.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-39.81%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 32.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-99.85%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.15%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 53.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-112.02%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 46.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.44%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of AMD's 93.06%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.