PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.47%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -68.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.94%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 5.94%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-30.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 105.97%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.82%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 7.59%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-316.27%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 128.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-23.27%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -264.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-328.79%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -137.38%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-31.73%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 173.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-115.15%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -109.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-96.83%
Negative yoy while AMD is 23.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-37.95%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 62.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-7.64%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-750.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-9533.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -168.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-50.00%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-43200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 100.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-598.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -145.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-152.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.