PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.17%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 27.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
277.57%
D&A growth well above AMD's 2.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-600.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
66.96%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -2.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
171.31%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -159.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
117.67%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. AMD's 241.07%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
135.76%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 55.91%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-111.27%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -125.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
653.33%
Growth well above AMD's 193.02%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-325.00%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -47.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
72.39%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.01%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-40.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-20891.18%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-756.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 68.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
128900.00%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 127.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-608.55%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 9050.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1178.67%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 116.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.84%
Debt repayment growth of 99.84% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while AMD is negative at -2500.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.