176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
114.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 30.00%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-25.99%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 1.82%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
33.75%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -22.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.41%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 19.28%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-368.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -726.47%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1152.27%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -229.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-272.22%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -23.21%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
2912.50%
AP growth well above AMD's 250.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-315.06%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -397.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
122.22%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -645.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-18.38%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -10.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-117.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -32.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
81.04%
Acquisition growth of 81.04% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
38.72%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -183.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
239.22%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 69.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
97.15%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -98.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
85.17%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -169.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.